Lyndsey Hendricks1 and Denise M. Mitrano2
1. TOFWERK, Switzerland
2. Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Introduction
Building on previous work, where the icpTOF was successfully used to quantify commercially available polystyrene beads as proxies for microplastics [1-3], here we explore the application of single-particle inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (sp-ICP-TOFMS) to analyze model microplastics derived from plastic waste [4].
Plastic samples were collected from the North Pacific Ocean. The large plastic items, which were environmentally weathered under natural conditions, were first fragmented into 1-2 cm pieces and further milled into micron-sized particles using a commercially available blender before analysis. After filtering and dilution into MilliQ water, the resulting suspension was analyzed using the icpTOF S2. The transient signals of these model microplastics were recorded, subsequently providing clear, distinguishable spikes of metals above the baseline which were associated with individual microplastics (Figure 1).
Characterization of Microplastics
Using the icpTOF integrated software (TOFpilot) with its dedicated single-particle workflow, the particle signals were extracted and evaluated. This workflow includes analyte selection, particle thresholding, split event correction, and background subtraction. This data allowed for the identification of different elements associated with the microplastics based on the concurrence of different signals. Elements such as aluminum, titanium, iron, zinc, copper and lead― commonly used as colorants, stabilizers, and flame retardants in plastics manufacturing ― were identified either individually or in combination with carbon. The analysis showed variations in the elemental fingerprint and concentration on a particle-by-particle basis, reflecting the heterogeneous nature of the metal distribution in the plastic itself. It is important to note that detecting all elements simultaneously requires not only a critical mass of the total material (i.e., particle mass) but also a sufficient metal loading in each individual microplastic. Without an adequate amount of material or metal loading, some elements may go undetected even if they are associated with microplastic.
The elemental fingerprints associated with each particle and their respective populations identified here depend heavily on the sensitivity and limits of detection (LODs) for each analyte. For instance, previous work on nanoparticle analysis revealed that the icpTOF achieved detection limits in terms of particle size in the tens of nanometers for various elements when the particle consisted solely of a single element [3]. However, detecting carbon is more challenging due to its high ionization potential and significant background interference. Consequently, the particle size LOD for carbon is approximately 1.5 micrometers [2,3]. This means that only micron-sized plastics will exhibit a carbon signature, whereas nano-sized plastics will predominantly show signatures of metal-based additives. Optimizing background levels and sensitivities is therefore critical to enhance detection capabilities, enabling the identification of smaller particles and more accurate characterization of microplastics, including their metal loading. Consequently, while the icpTOF enables the determination of multi-element fingerprints, the populations detected here depend on the sensitivity and limits of detection (LODs) for each analyte as well as the heterogenous nature of the plastic being studied (Figure 2).
This analysis highlights the potential of the icpTOF for accurate detection and characterization of microplastics in real-world environmental samples.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge The Ocean Cleanup for providing the oceanic plastic waste samples used in this study.
References
[1] Breaking barriers in microplastic detection using Single-Particle ICP-TOFMS, Application Note, TOFWERK 2024.
[2] Hendriks L. & Mitrano M. D., Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 18, 7263–7272. DOI: 10.1039/D2JA00295G
[3] Haricky S. & Gundlach-Graham A., J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2023,38, 111-120. DOI: 10.1039/D2JA00295G
[4] Baalousha M., et al, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2024, 11, 373-388. DOI: 10.1039/D3EN00559C